Tolerating the food security question will only cause people to do oneself great harm

Tolerating the food security question will only cause people to do oneself great harm
If someone tells you, over the past 20 years, you have been eating a kind of thing, the thing have any advantage, more a bit intaking amount to health, will cause the injury to people, what responses will you have - -This kind of thing is brightening agent of flour.
Last year, the question regarding brightening agent of flour is inactive, the national grains bureau had already filed the application material, Ministry of Public Health has already determined to submit to the standardized committee of national food additive to discuss according to relevant rules too. But nowadays, several months passed by, in our sight, one has no news discussed, there is not two an inactive result. On the 12th of this month, the media finds out the relevant progress from Ministry of Public Health on this question again, the related departments of Ministry of Public Health say, relevant at present to assess the work still discussing course, whether forbid and has not made the decision yet finally. Perhaps someone will say, do such a big thing, there must be course, how can finish during such short time. But this is a major issue about food security, the meaning is extraordinary, need the special thing badly to be specially done.
Yesterday, until we fall into disuse for time of several month worried, a more surprising news has come. As far back as 2001, 65 big enterprises of the processing industry of flour of our country appealed for on signing jointly to the related departments and forbade brightening agent. Now, time 8 year already in an instant, in 8 year, in kidnapped by a kind of known danger we.
Then, what is the danger of brightening agent of flour on earth? Famous nutrition expert, researcher of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital nutriology dept. Zhao Lin say, low dose of the food adds strong oxidant and is usually thought the poisonous side effect not big, but it reduces products harmful to liver function obstacle person, may become which cause hepatocarcinoma to superpose the factor. In addition, wheat (2139, - 13.00, - 0.60%) Add strong oxidant in the powder, has also destroyed nutrient such as VE, folic acid, nicotinic acid. The whole world lack, born every year because of folic acid 200,000th nerve in charge of teratogenesis, 100,000 of our country among them, took it to half unexpectedly.
Because flour brightening agent can only beautify the impressions, does not have any advantage to the human body, a lot of countries hold carefully and use the attitude. And our country is that the only approval has used the country who oxidizes calcium in the flour in the world, and this has made use of it and has already been up to 20 years. In such cases, that discussion of never stopping of ours involves, it is not a efficiency question. The relevant report shows, behind the ones that prohibited and can't help in brightening agent of flour, there is battle of fierce interests. On one hand the battle of the interests of large flour mill and little flour mill, on the other hand if brightening agent is forbidden, will touch the interests for producing producer of brightening agent. And flour brightening agent prohibits this simple problem and can't help, become complicated like this.
To the tolerance of relevant interests person, it is ignoring to public life. Here, the danger of brightening agent of flour has already been almost fact, as to this, we must " zero is tolerated " . I think, the discussions of the related departments can keep to the conventional way of going on, but for public interests, it is necessary to take the inactive measure temporarily, keep being dangerous outside of the door.
As history is come into February 28 this year, " food safety law " passed in a high rate has already " executed " brightening agent of flour in situ (used after a verb to indicate the completion of an action). " food safety law " stipulates: "Food additive should be really necessary technically and passes the evaluation certificate of the risk it is safe and reliable, Fang KeLie enters the range allowed to use. " The room yellow Wei of division chief of administrative law of working committee of law of Standing Committee of the National People's Congress points out, " food safety law " is " safe and reliable " at this point Foundation have emphasize " It is really necessary technically " . He says: "It is essential for the technological necessity to mean the material added produces the food, without causing influence on food quality. To the healthy attention with people, additive that only beautifies the food can be cancelled. " Contrast this clause, even brightening agent of flour is harmless, it is not " essential " ,Inactive and already inevitable. In this case, why have not the related departments issued an order yet, store on the heart by sheer good luck yet?
|