Guangzhou Daily: " Arsenicum door " Not only a food security question

Guangzhou Daily: " Arsenicum door " Not only a food security question
An onlooker seem should be found out the question very easily, it is still complicated and confusing in a few days to toss about, and let this complicated legal case be already gone beyond in saliva battle of upgrading constantly " Find whether it is accurate or not " Question,rise to the ones getting more key in piece aspect.
Unify and the farmer mountain spring one " The Arsenicum door " The incident, more and more like a mystery.
Municipal industrial and commercial bureau to Haikou " The warning of consumption " ,Involving in enterprise's latest reaction movement of the thing shows the smell of gunpowder even more sheerly - -Farmer's mountain spring Chairman dishes out while meeting the media " The evil backstage manipulator handles the theory " ,And may claim 1 billion yuan; But the industrial and commercial bureau of Haikou expresses the result of test of ready samples still in waiting for Beijing; Entrusted by industrial and commercial bureau of Haikou the person in charge of technique center of inspection and quarantine of entry and exit inspection and quarantine bureau of Hainan measuring but vouched for expressing too, certain arsenic of these products exceed standard, and claim to be " responsible for measuring the result "
An onlooker seems it should be a question found out very easily, it is still complicated and confusing in a few days to toss about, this itself is abnormal. Beverage really arsenic exceeds standard, concern consumers' health directly. A sound consumer protect the mechanism, once face this kind and " wade the poison " Suspicion and dispute, more high-level functional department responds to voluntarily, start and verify the procedure immediately, but not wait for both sides fighting with words to be each " Inspect by ready samples " . This kind is " waited for " Posture,it is lack to last sense of responsibility, there are confused in supervision on explanation even more.
And saliva battle and severe word of upgrading constantly, have let this complicated legal case already go beyond simple " find whether it is accurate or not " Question,every one is key after and rising to. We hope, involving in thing enterprises and the products really wrongs with good intention; Meanwhile, we hope, a person of integrity can stand severe tests for the testing result of administration for industry and commerce with good intention. However, obviously, these two kinds of situations can not be tenable at the same time. Then, people have reasons to leave a question open - -Alternatively, and not views whether some enterprises possess the most basic sincerity; Whether alternatively, the related departments possess most basic public trust and personal integrity of the common right.
Stick to one's own version according to a of both sides one, we might as well come, suppose : On day coming to light in the incident, it verifies finally that really there is a problem to involve in the thing products. If the result is like this, this transforms attitude of swearing an oath in all solemnity with relevant enterprises now into great contrast, but its back, the disappearance of exposing ethics of basic markets of some enterprises and sincerity. If there is no consumers' health in the eyes in enterprises, have not revered to the law either, the crisis that and is used to utilizing capital strength to balance " to exceed standard " ,Skilled until quality problem commit an act of fraud for malignant competition and power seek rent products by the intersection of crisis and public relation means, such an enterprise citizen is undoubtedly incompetent, such a market is undoubtedly imperfect too.
Or, let's suppose (only suppose too) : The farmer mountain spring " if does not improve relationships with the industry and commerce while threatening it to administration for industry and commerce, the products can not be sold in Hainan " ,etc. accusation a fact,prove whether what it is? According to present situation, temporary quality problem of beverage, local administration for industry and commerce measure and release procedure to consume prewarning, according to news report to really exist in some places not tight, unstandard. No wonder this will drop " Seek and rent " With " illegitimate competition " Cause for gossip. The common right department ought to punish evil-doers and praise good-doers with the motive open and upright, transparent act, maintain the market order. In this way, can make, punish enterprise to be convinced not only protect consumers but also; On the contrary, clean with the handle, difficult card to unavoidably award people.
The first kind of assumption, concern the conscience of the market; The second kind of assumption, concern the common letter of common right. The two must store one. This incident, whether no longer several bottles of beverages include the question that arsenic exceeds standard, and concern the major issues of principle. A kind of result that consumers hope to see least is: This kind of public incident, " confer " with a certain backstage finally ,Involve in both sides of the thing and turn hostility into friendship, dislike and abandon, shake hands before the end to the limit, use " misunderstand " , " misunderstanding " Or " read by mistake " Diplomatic language,it is cool quietly not to last each actually. It is unidentified on in the public,be but become by most helpless at incident game chip, and the so-called public interests and public right of being in know, have not received the respect genuinely from the beginning. Such precedent, have. I wish, this kind of result was on " Arsenicum door " Don't appear in the incident.

|